Last updated 1 year ago by Chris Coyiercss
Let's go rapid fire and try to answer this question with quick points rather than long explanations. There are a lot of similarities between flexbox and grid, starting with the fact that they are used for layout and much more powerful than any layout technique that came before them. They can stretch and shrink, they can center things, they can re-order things, they can align things... There are plenty of layout situations in which you could use either one to do what we need to do, and plenty of situations where one is more well-suited than the other. Let's focus on the differences rather than the similarities:
Flexbox can optionally *wrap.* If we allow a flex container to wrap, they will wrap down onto another row when the flex items fill a row. Where they line up on the next row is independent of what happenned on the first row, allowing for a masonry-like look.
Grid can also optionally wrap (if we allow auto filling) in the sense that items can fill a row and move to the new row (or auto place themselves), but as they do, they will fall along the same grid lines all the other elements do.
You could think of flexbox as "one dimensional." While flexbox can make rows and columns in the sense that it allows elements to wrap, there's no way to declaratively control where elements end up since the elements merely push along a single axis and then wrap or not wrap accordingly. They do as they do, if you will, along a one-dimensional plane and it's because of that single dimension that we can optionally do things, like align elements along a baseline — which is something grid is unable to do.
flex-flow: row wrap; /* OK elements, go as far as you can on one line, then wrap as you see fit */
You could think of grid as "two dimensional" in that we can (if we want to) declare the sizing of rows and columns and then explicitly place things into both rows and columns as we choose.